In October 2025, during the widespread No Kings protests opposing the policies and actions of the Second Trump administration, a controversial incident ignited intense public debate and media attention. President Donald Trump posted an AI-generated video on his social media platform, Truth Social, which quickly became a major topic of discussion across political and social spheres. The video depicted a striking and provocative image of Trump himself: he wore a crown symbolizing monarchial authority while piloting a fighter jet labeled "King Trump. " The aircraft flew over an urban area and above a crowd of protesters. The video took a contentious turn by showing liquid resembling feces being dropped from the jet onto the crowd below. Among the targets was liberal influencer Harry Sisson, who was clearly identifiable in the scene. Adding to the dramatic and rebellious tone, the soundtrack featured the iconic song "Danger Zone" by Kenny Loggins, known for its association with high-energy, adrenaline-filled scenarios. The combination of the vivid imagery and energetic music gave the video a sensational and provocative nature that swiftly drew public and media attention. However, the response was largely negative. Many deemed the video inappropriate, unprofessional, and deeply offensive, especially given the tense social and political context of ongoing protests.

One prominent critic was House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries, who publicly condemned the video. He described the content as unbecoming of a sitting president and voiced concerns about its impact on national discourse and the dignity of the presidency. Kenny Loggins, whose song had been used without permission, also voiced outrage and disappointment over the unauthorized use of his music in such a politically sensitive and controversial setting. His reaction underscored broader issues related to intellectual property rights and the ethical implications of repurposing artistic works in political content without consent. In contrast, Speaker Mike Johnson defended President Trump’s actions, portraying the video as satire or a political joke intended to make a "point" rather than offend or provoke. He stressed the importance of interpreting the video within the framework of political expression and highlighted satire’s role in democratic debate. This incident highlighted the increasingly complex and contentious intersection of technology, politics, and media in contemporary American society. The deployment of artificial intelligence to create politically charged content raised important questions about the responsibilities of public figures and the possible ramifications of using emerging digital technologies to shape public opinion and political discussions. As the dialogue continues, the video remains a powerful example of the challenges and opportunities presented by new media forms in political communication. The event invites reflection on the limits of political expression, the influence of social media platforms, and the evolving nature of public discourse in the digital era.