Artificial intelligence (AI) holds both the potential to eliminate discriminatory housing practices and facilitate access to government benefits, as well as the risk of denying essential services like healthcare or loans based on race. To address these issues, Democratic Assemblymember Rebecca Bauer-Kahan from San Ramon has proposed Assembly Bill 1018, which aims to protect individuals from automated discrimination. This bill would require AI developers to assess their technology's performance before deployment and notify users when AI is used to make significant decisions concerning employment, education, healthcare, and more. It also grants individuals the right to opt-out of AI decision-making processes and appeal those decisions. California lawmakers are actively seeking to regulate AI, with Bauer-Kahan leading initiatives focused on safeguarding citizens against discriminatory practices. This year, multiple bills have been introduced, some of which were previously vetoed by Governor Gavin Newsom. Among these proposals is legislation requiring human drivers for commercial vehicles and a reevaluation of the risks associated with AI technology. Despite last year's advancements in AI laws, the political landscape has shifted, with the current Trump administration stepping back from AI regulation. As a result, California lawmakers may have a greater impetus to enact protective regulations. Experts anticipate that the push for state legislation will intensify as existing federal guidelines are rolled back, highlighting the state's unique position in the tech sector. The contrasting approaches towards AI regulation were apparent at a recent Paris summit, where leaders from various nations gathered.

While some, like former White House official Alondra Nelson, advocated for ensuring AI serves humanity and enhances democracy, others, including Vice President J. D. Vance, expressed a strong stance against what they perceive as excessive regulations. Concerns about AI also extend to its implications for low-income Americans, as a report revealed that AI systems often hinder access to essential government services. With California housing a significant portion of tech talent and venture capital, the outcome of AI regulatory discussions in the state could have far-reaching implications. Pressure from civil rights organizations and increasing public concern over AI's impact may bolster lawmakers' efforts to implement robust protections. Advocates emphasize the need for legislation that is not overly influenced or weakened by corporate interests. Bauer-Kahan remains steadfast in her commitment to prevent AI-related discrimination, demonstrating the criticality of effective state-level regulation amid evolving federal stances on the issue.