AI and Privacy: The Need for Federal Legislation in the U.S.

Artificial intelligence (AI) has had a significant impact on all industries, but the United States lacks uniform nationwide rules on how companies process personal information for AI development and deployment. While the European Union has enacted comprehensive laws to govern data governance, including the General Data Protection Regulation, Digital Services Act, and Artificial Intelligence Act, the U. S. still needs to consider new rules to protect privacy and regulate AI-enhanced surveillance. The development and deployment of AI create privacy risks due to the large amounts of personal and nonpersonal data needed to train algorithms. Algorithms can uncover private information about individuals by analyzing seemingly unrelated data points, which can lead to economic, security, and reputational harm. The U. S. has taken some policy actions to address privacy risks, such as the Executive Order on Safe, Secure, and Trustworthy Development and Use of Artificial Intelligence.
However, there is a need for federal legislation that mandates privacy protections for companies nationwide. The European Union has taken significant steps to address privacy risks associated with AI, including the AI Act, which classifies algorithmic systems based on their level of risk and imposes restrictions on high-risk systems. The GDPR and Digital Services Act also provide individuals with rights to opt-out of automated decision-making and require transparency in data processing. There are opportunities for the EU and U. S. to align their regulatory approaches on AI and privacy, with U. S. federal legislation prioritizing the responsibilities of AI developers and users to mitigate privacy risks, transparency requirements, defining acceptable uses of AI-driven surveillance, and granting individuals the right to opt-out of automated decision-making.
Brief news summary
AI presents privacy risks due to the use of large amounts of data and algorithms that can infer private information. While the EU has comprehensive regulations like the GDPR, DSA, and AI Act to address these risks, the US lacks nationwide regulations. The US government has taken some steps, but more federal legislation is needed. The EU's approach could serve as a guide for the US, promoting consistency and privacy protection. Both regions have opportunities for regulatory alignment, and US tech companies are already complying with EU law. Aligning privacy regulations could enhance trust in AI and ensure safer outcomes.
AI-powered Lead Generation in Social Media
and Search Engines
Let AI take control and automatically generate leads for you!

I'm your Content Manager, ready to handle your first test assignment
Learn how AI can help your business.
Let’s talk!
Hot news

AI and Climate Change: Predicting Environmental I…
In recent years, the merging of technology and environmental science has enabled innovative strategies to address the urgent challenges of climate change.

Rethinking Stablecoins: How Governments Can Embra…
Over the past decade, cryptocurrency has experienced rapid growth, originating from skepticism toward centralized authority.

Why Is Everyone Talking About SoundHound AI Stock?
Key Points SoundHound offers an independent AI voice platform serving multiple industries, targeting a total addressable market (TAM) of $140 billion

Telegram's TON Ecosystem: A Billion-User Playbook…
The next frontier in the blockchain industry isn’t solely technical innovation but mass adoption, with Telegram’s TON ecosystem, powered by The Open Platform (TOP), at the forefront.

16 billion passwords leaked. Is it finally time f…
The 16 Billion Password Leak: What Really Happened?

AI in Manufacturing: Optimizing Production Proces…
Artificial intelligence (AI) is fundamentally transforming the manufacturing industry by optimizing production processes through advanced technology integration.

Independent Publishers File Antitrust Complaint A…
A coalition of independent publishers has filed an antitrust complaint with the European Commission, accusing Google of market abuse through its AI Overviews feature.