lang icon En
Jan. 30, 2025, 3:37 p.m.
2610

US Copyright Office Denies Copyright Protection for AI-Generated Outputs

Brief news summary

The US Copyright Office has concluded that works created by artificial intelligence (AI) through text prompts do not qualify for copyright protection under current laws, as detailed in a recent report. This affirmation aligns with existing copyright regulations, indicating no immediate need for legal changes. Consequently, users of AI tools are not considered authors of the content generated, irrespective of the complexity of their prompts, complicating claims for works like "Théâtre D’opéra Spatial." The report highlights the difference between AI as a tool that enhances human creativity versus AI acting as a replacement. Works that combine significant human input—such as comics with AI-generated images and human-written text—may still be copyrightable. While the text prompts themselves are not copyrightable, there is an indication that highly creative prompts could reflect a level of expressiveness. As technology evolves, the potential exists for new policies to extend copyright protections to AI-generated works, influenced by user engagement. The Copyright Office is examining the legal ramifications of AI use and plans to issue further reports to address current policy gaps.

According to the US Copyright Office, generative artificial intelligence outputs created from text prompts, even detailed ones, are not protected by current copyright law. This conclusion comes from a comprehensive report addressing copyright issues related to AI, stating that existing copyright principles apply without the need for legal changes, offering limited protection for many works. The guidelines highlight that AI prompts lack sufficient control to designate AI users as authors of the output, regardless of prompt complexity. The final output is viewed as a reflection of the AI's interpretation rather than the user's authorship. This ruling affects cases like the Midjourney-generated “Théâtre D’opéra Spatial, ” which faced copyright registration challenges. The office illustrated AI unpredictability with an example of a Gemini-produced image that disregarded certain instructions, resembling Jackson Pollock’s artistic process where control is over creative choices rather than outcomes. The emphasis is on the human control level over the creative process. While using AI as a creative aid doesn’t jeopardize copyright, there’s a distinction between AI as a tool versus a replacement for human creativity.

Authors can integrate AI-generated elements into their works if sufficient creative modification occurs, maintaining copyright protection for the overall product. For instance, comics with human selections of AI images or films with AI-generated effects may still be copyrightable. The report also discusses the copyrightability of text prompts, likening them to uncopyrightable instructions, though some creative prompts could feature expressive elements. However, this doesn’t imply protection for the resultant works. The Copyright Office notes the evolving nature of technology could change the landscape, suggesting future AI systems might allow greater control over expressive output. This document is part of a broader initiative to clarify AI-related copyright policies, with a forthcoming report on the legal implications of training AI on copyrighted works.


Watch video about

US Copyright Office Denies Copyright Protection for AI-Generated Outputs

Try our premium solution and start getting clients — at no cost to you

I'm your Content Creator.
Let’s make a post or video and publish it on any social media — ready?

Language

Hot news

All news

AI Company

Launch your AI-powered team to automate Marketing, Sales & Growth

and get clients on autopilot — from social media and search engines. No ads needed

Begin getting your first leads today